In the end, it did end up meeting the 20GW target goal while maintaining horizontal scalability:ĭScoffers wrote:I'm not the OP, but I have borrowed this design for my map. That's how down to the wire this design had to be in order to maintain efficiency! It turns out I couldn't afford to even add a few underground pipes to make way for power poles in one of the existing rows of pumps. Using a straight line of pumps will always preserve the throughput. One neat thing which I've learned about pumps is that they don't suffer from any dropoff. Every pipe which I added caused hundreds of units of fluid per second to disappear. Since the water and steam pipes have to have the same throughput (1 unit of water = 1 unit of steam), they both suffer from the same dropoff bottleneck. Having one lane for power poles was also surprisingly necessary, because I had to use pumps the entire way. Again, the two tiles that I bought by creating a gap between the heat exchangers came in handy here. ![]() This means that I had to pump the water back past the steam turbines to the heat exchangers. ![]() Since I wanted this thing to scale infinitely I needed to put the water inputs on the outside of the reactor to make room for an arbitrary number of belts. This reactor uses over 200,000 water per second, so barrels are pretty much necessary (10,000 water per second per belt versus the ~1000 you get from a typical pipe).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |